NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT
0.336 TFLOPS
A2
+1248%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
10
112
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
GA107
G92-280-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
260 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
