Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GTX and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 141W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 9
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
47.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
470.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV516
G92-420-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

141W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy