Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GX2 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (197W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GX2
0.384 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +3189%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
70
128
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

197W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA100
G92-450-A2
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy