Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce G102M and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce G102M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce G102M
0.035 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile +5020%
1.792 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.584 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

C79
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
MCP79MX
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Xe-LPG
-
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
Unknown
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

14W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy