CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 47W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (24.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
+106%
0.093 TFLOPS
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
VS
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Aug 2009
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
32
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
G84
GT218-200-B1
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
31W
TDP
47W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
2
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
3
AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
5
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
6
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
7
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
9
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570
10
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy