Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 8.064GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce G210 OEM
0.043 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +53481%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
504 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
8.064GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
40
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net