Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce G210M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce G210M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce G210M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce G210M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce G210M
0.048 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +85629%
41.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1425 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
76
16
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
5.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.15 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
41.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
643.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD103
N10M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy