NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1590MHz vs 1379MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
1.059 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+169%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2018
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1152 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1379 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
33.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
16.55 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1059 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
33.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
TU116
GP108-310-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
