CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 GK107 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 1030 GK107
+51%
0.812 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030 GK107
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.464 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
33.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
812.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
33.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
3
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
7
AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs ATI FirePro V3750
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
Related News
1
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
2
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
3
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
4
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
5
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
6
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
7
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
9
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
10
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy