NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+8774%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 100
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
89.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0
