NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+3065%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 100
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
32
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
89.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
