NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
+9457%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 100
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
89.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
