NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 25W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.34GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
+1371%
1.177 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
May 2017
GeForce 100M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.34GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
3
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
