NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 20W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 25.34GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
+1398%
1.199 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 100M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
747 MHz
-
Boost Clock
937 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.34GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
5
32
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
