Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +733%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 100
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.02GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
12
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy