NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
+1711%
3.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 100
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
5 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
