CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
+33%
0.208 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
0.156 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
VS
GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2012
GeForce 100
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Board Design
105W
TDP
29W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
5
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
6
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
7
AMD Radeon RX 7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 505 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy