Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +3838%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 100
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy