Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG +5020%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Vega 10
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy