Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +4471%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
80
96
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GV100
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy