Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1086MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 5100 +1414%
3.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Nov 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
713 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1086 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.75 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
121.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.892 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.892 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 PRO GL (215-0876144)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy