Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +1702%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Navi 14
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy