Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +2670%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Polaris 30
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy