Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (54.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV560
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy