Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240M
0.116 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +1621%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 200M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Pitcairn
N10P-GS
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy