Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (43W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +217%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
72
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GT200B
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy