Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 43W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
72
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
2
8
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
VSA-101
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy