Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
ATI Radeon HD 3690 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (26.56GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3690 +128%
0.429 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Mar 2008
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
26.56GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
72
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.72 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV670
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy