Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 10.40GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP 's Advantages
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM +95%
0.188 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4350 AGP
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
10.40GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
72
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV710
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy