CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 330W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
5048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XTX
+13160%
24.93 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
VS
Radeon RX 6900 XTX
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2435 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
80
72
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
311.7 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
779.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.87 TFLOPS
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.558 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
Navi 21
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
43W
TDP
330W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
2
ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
3
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9350
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Complete Layout of Intel's Next-Gen LGA1851 Interface Exposed: A Comprehensive Look at PCIe and USB Features
2
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
3
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
4
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
5
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
6
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
7
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
8
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
9
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
10
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy