Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
72
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV530
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy