NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+24409%
12.99 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
24
24
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
