Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 330 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 330 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +420%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
96
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy