Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs Intel Arc A770

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +7549%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 300
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy