Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (27.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 69W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

69W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV516
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy