Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI FirePro V9800

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +958%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1600
32
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Cypress
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy