Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1392MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +731%
2.138 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1392 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
6
96
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.54 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.41 GFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.138 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GP107
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
GP107-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy