Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (69W vs 200W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +49%
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

69W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
R600
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy