Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +8468%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Navi 21
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy