Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +1493%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy