Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +1872%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Hawaii
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy