NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 176W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+4098%
10.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
May 2022
GeForce 300
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2055 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2635 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2190 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
280.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
168.6 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
337.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.59 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.79 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
674.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
176W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
Navi 23
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 23 KXT
(215-130000136)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
