NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+2245%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
