Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 49W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 PCI +540%
0.269 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

49W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
RV610
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy