Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 49W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +363%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Lexa
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy