NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 21.34GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
0.311 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
+53%
0.477 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
21.34GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
311.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
GT200
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
