NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 21.34GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
0.311 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+1741%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
21.34GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
311.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
