Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +1128%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 500
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
2
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
134.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
11.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Polaris 23
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy