Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +2013%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
265W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Tonga
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy