Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +3510%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 500
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
580W
200 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Hawaii
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy